|
Airplane Accidents
Boating Accidents
Cerebral Palsy
Spinal Cord Injury
Medical Malpractice
Construction Accidents
DUI Law
Motor Vehicle Accidents
Traumatic Brain Injury
Hazardous Products
Tort Drug Litigation
Personal Injury
Premises Liability
Railroad Accidents
Wrongful Death
Nursing Home Abuse
|
About the Firm / Case Summaries
- Worker was on a construction site when another subcontractor
at the jobsite placed a tarp over an open pit. Worker stepped onto
the tarp and fell into the hole and suffered significant back injuries.
Case was resolved by settlement.
- Patron injured in a local bar. Patron was authorized to
carry a handgun. Patron placed the gun in the waistband of his pants.
An altercation broke out between Patron and another customer. The
bouncer attempted to break up the incident when he saw the gun in
Patron’s hand. The bouncer took the gun away from Patron and
started striking him on the head, causing numerous wounds. Patron
was falsely accused of aiming his handgun at the bouncer. Patron
was found not guilty of pointing a handgun at the bouncer. The Patron
filed suit against the local bar for malicious prosecution and battery.
Jury trial verdict for Patron. The verdict included compensation
for pain and suffering, mental distress, and punitive damages. The
case was settled on appeal.
- Suit was filed in federal court in the Northern District
of Indiana for excessive force by Fort Wayne police officers. Motorist
was struck by a 14 year old driver who disregarded a stop sign.
Motorist was lawfully driving his fiancé and his two children
home. Motorist suffered sternum and shoulder injuries from the motor
vehicle accident. Motorist attempted to explain to the police officers
that two individuals had run from the 14 year old’s motor
vehicle. The police, without justification, suddenly attacked Motorist.
Police claimed that Motorist had attacked them and they were only
using reasonable force. Motorist was diagnosed with a herniated
disk injury to his neck requiring an operation as a result of the
police use of excessive force. Jury trial verdict for the Motorist.
- Thirty five year old handicapped woman who experienced
epileptic seizures went to a group home to learn to live independently.
She was housed in a two story home where she suffered an epileptic
seizure at the top of the stairs. The woman had a seizure and fell
down the stairs, breaking her neck and rendering her a quadriplegic.
Woman died of unrelated causes, but her estate was compensated for
her injuries and mental suffering from the time of her injury until
her death.
- Construction worker working on a building in a large northern
Indiana metropolitan city suffered significant injuries when the
Worker stepped through a makeshift cover that had been inadequately
secured. This incident caused significant injuries to Worker’s
back and neck resulting in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Worker
was found to be permanently and totally disabled. Worker was compensated
for his injuries and loss of income.
- 14 year old student was brutally assaulted by four other
students in a high school parking lot. The attack was unprovoked
and left the boy with severe facial injuries, including a fractured
jaw in two places and missing teeth. This occurred after classes
were dismissed for the day. The boys who committed the attack were
prosecuted and convicted of battery. Civil suit was brought against
the school district for failing to properly supervise the students
under its care. The security guard company hired by the school district
was also sued. Investigation showed that a large and noisy crowd
of young people had gathered around the Student just before the
attack, which would have placed the school authorities on notice
of suspicious activity. However, the security guard had abandoned
his duty station in the parking lot in order to make a personal
phone call inside the school,
and the school officials who customarily observed the students leaving
the building were also absent that day. The school district sought
to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it was immune from
such a lawsuit both by statute and the common law. Although the
trial court ruled in favor of the school district, the Indiana Court
of Appeals held in a lengthy opinion that the school district could
be held liable and that this case should proceed to trial. The Indiana
Supreme Court agreed with the appellate court’s reasoning
and affirmed its decision. This case has been cited many times in
legal briefs and other appellate court decisions for its analysis
of the legal duties owed by schools to their students and how those
duties relate to the statutory immunities under the Indiana Tort
Claims Act. Case was settled with both the school district and the
security guard company before trial.
- 83 year old WWII veteran of Japanese descent residing in
a small Indiana city went to a community center for the aging. Veteran
slipped and fell on the sidewalk containing snow and ice and suffered
a broken hip. Community center allowed snow and slush to remain
on the grounds even though it had not snowed again for three days.
The manager for the community center stated that she had personally
observed the sidewalk and that it was dry and safe. Veteran’s
son took photographs of the sidewalk five hours after the incident
which still showed evidence of snow and slush. Case was settled
through mediation after defendant realize that plaintiff was prepared
to go trial.
- Traveling health care provider was driving northbound on
I-65 when she was sideswiped by a company vehicle towing a trailer.
Health care provider went off the road and the car rolled over.
Health care provider suffered soft tissue injuries. The company’s
insurance carrier hired an investigator to spy on health care provider
and her two daughters while sunbathing. The videotape showed conduct
of health care provider consistent with her injuries. Defendant
settled case for fear that the jury would be offended by insurance
company’s invasion of health care provider’s and her
daughter’s privacy.
- Customer was visiting an auto auction. Customer was injured
while inspecting an automobile when an employee of the auction moved
a car into the rear of another car, crushing customer’s pelvis.
Case settled for significant compensation for customer’s pain
and suffering even though customer had minimal impairment.
|
Complimentary and Confidential
|